<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thought: On John Chow ranking higher on Google than ProBlogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger</link>
	<description>Analysis of Reason - Finding out the reasons for the insanity in the universe</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger#comment-19823</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger/#comment-19823</guid>
		<description>Easton, thanks for stopping by. :)

You are right; it is nice to open up a few results in order to compare what is out there. Search engine results do "fluctuate", so people should not consider something that appears first to be better than others. They should read and decide on their own.

Thanks for the good point Easton, and thanks for stopping by. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easton, thanks for stopping by. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
You are right; it is nice to open up a few results in order to compare what is out there. Search engine results do &#8220;fluctuate&#8221;, so people should not consider something that appears first to be better than others. They should read and decide on their own.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good point Easton, and thanks for stopping by. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Easton Ellsworth</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger#comment-19806</link>
		<dc:creator>Easton Ellsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger/#comment-19806</guid>
		<description>Good points here.  Personally, if I Googled "make money online," I would open up at least several of the top results anyway.  Plus I think a lot of Web users now understand that search results typically fluctuate, so it's not that big of a deal to see who has the number one result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points here.  Personally, if I Googled &#8220;make money online,&#8221; I would open up at least several of the top results anyway.  Plus I think a lot of Web users now understand that search results typically fluctuate, so it&#8217;s not that big of a deal to see who has the number one result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger#comment-19789</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger/#comment-19789</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, I really appreciate it. Thank you also for taking the time to read this article. :)

Yes, being among the top results does not matter much if you are not delivering top notch content. People will come. Some will stay, while others will feel disappointed or even deceived because of having their time wasted on something on a site with not enough or good content, even if that ranked higher on Google search results for certain keywords.

Thanks again ohcash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, I really appreciate it. Thank you also for taking the time to read this article. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Yes, being among the top results does not matter much if you are not delivering top notch content. People will come. Some will stay, while others will feel disappointed or even deceived because of having their time wasted on something on a site with not enough or good content, even if that ranked higher on Google search results for certain keywords.</p>
<p>Thanks again ohcash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohcash</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger#comment-19773</link>
		<dc:creator>ohcash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/thought-on-john-chow-ranking-higher-on-google-than-problogger/#comment-19773</guid>
		<description>You are 100% right and I totally agree with you. Being on top search engines mean nothing if you do not have content for your visitors to become regulars. They just just come and go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are 100% right and I totally agree with you. Being on top search engines mean nothing if you do not have content for your visitors to become regulars. They just just come and go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
