<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question: Do you prefer non-personal blogs over personal blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs</link>
	<description>Analysis of Reason - Finding out the reasons for the insanity in the universe</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-50893</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-50893</guid>
		<description>Hey Bes... Great conversations going on here.

You asked what I meant by "just the facts blogs" --  I was referring to the type of blog that offers updates or reports on a subject, without any sense of personality at all, and yes, I think they are often  specialized niche blogs, though they don't have to be.

For these blogs, the authors can change, but as a reader, I'd never notice. These blogs have to stay very focused on their topic, or they'll lose me.  With no personal interest in the blogger themselves, no sense of a relationship, the minute it stops being useful, I'm gone. 

The comments about testimonials were interesting -- For me, very few of them register on my radar, and I often suspect they're "not real" since new products often crop up with 50 glowing testimonials...  meaning they are either forged, from beta testers, from friends, etc.  A personal recommendation from one blogger I trust goes a lot further than 100 testimonials from strangers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bes&#8230; Great conversations going on here.</p>
<p>You asked what I meant by &#8220;just the facts blogs&#8221; &#8212;  I was referring to the type of blog that offers updates or reports on a subject, without any sense of personality at all, and yes, I think they are often  specialized niche blogs, though they don&#8217;t have to be.</p>
<p>For these blogs, the authors can change, but as a reader, I&#8217;d never notice. These blogs have to stay very focused on their topic, or they&#8217;ll lose me.  With no personal interest in the blogger themselves, no sense of a relationship, the minute it stops being useful, I&#8217;m gone. </p>
<p>The comments about testimonials were interesting &#8212; For me, very few of them register on my radar, and I often suspect they&#8217;re &#8220;not real&#8221; since new products often crop up with 50 glowing testimonials&#8230;  meaning they are either forged, from beta testers, from friends, etc.  A personal recommendation from one blogger I trust goes a lot further than 100 testimonials from strangers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-50724</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-50724</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Carolyn Manning&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for explaining further. You have some very good points. For that same reason, I start wondering "&lt;em&gt;Is this all 100% accurate?&lt;/em&gt;" when I see testimonials on websites from supposed hosting ro other product customers and no way for a person to verify the authenticity, like a link to their website or even a way to e-mail those people.

Many reviews are indeed sponsored, or are written by people who are intending to show why a product is good, and thus there may be a high chance that they may push only the strong good points onto the public. Good point again.

I really think that phrase is interesting. :) Thank you again.

&lt;strong&gt;Vivien-inspirationbit&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for sharing. That is how one of the ways to look at this, in my view, should be: to give everyone a fair chance and then decide whether or not something is worth our time and attention.

That is a good way to measure things, to see whether we have more personal or more non-personal blogs in our readers, bookmarks and other places. That can also help us understand why we may like something, yet our actions may say things a bit differently. It sure will help me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Carolyn Manning</strong>, thanks for explaining further. You have some very good points. For that same reason, I start wondering &#8220;<em>Is this all 100% accurate?</em>&#8221; when I see testimonials on websites from supposed hosting ro other product customers and no way for a person to verify the authenticity, like a link to their website or even a way to e-mail those people.</p>
<p>Many reviews are indeed sponsored, or are written by people who are intending to show why a product is good, and thus there may be a high chance that they may push only the strong good points onto the public. Good point again.</p>
<p>I really think that phrase is interesting. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Thank you again.</p>
<p><strong>Vivien-inspirationbit</strong>, thanks for sharing. That is how one of the ways to look at this, in my view, should be: to give everyone a fair chance and then decide whether or not something is worth our time and attention.</p>
<p>That is a good way to measure things, to see whether we have more personal or more non-personal blogs in our readers, bookmarks and other places. That can also help us understand why we may like something, yet our actions may say things a bit differently. It sure will help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inspirationbit</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-50493</link>
		<dc:creator>inspirationbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-50493</guid>
		<description>I prefer interesting blogs and the ones where I learn something new. I also enjoy reading someone's gifted writing be it a personal or not. Although I do have more non-personal than personal blogs in my reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer interesting blogs and the ones where I learn something new. I also enjoy reading someone&#8217;s gifted writing be it a personal or not. Although I do have more non-personal than personal blogs in my reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Manning</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-50443</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-50443</guid>
		<description>"I wonder if advertisements can be made more personal by not only including personal stories of customers supporting a product but also doing otherwise."

Answer:  a resounding "I don't know".

To be honest, I don't trust testimonials unless I know the person giving the testament.  If you didn't know me and saw an advertisement with an endorsement from "Carolyn Manning, Pennsylvania" what in the world would induce you to believe it?  Without personal knowledge, you don't even know if there's a person by that name living in Pennsylvania.

A public review is an alternative, but that isn't without it's jade, either.  Many reviews are sponsored, therefore we're back to "believe it or not".

If I'm close to being right, that leaves us with the phrase you like so much:  a personal flavor using the writer's natural flair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder if advertisements can be made more personal by not only including personal stories of customers supporting a product but also doing otherwise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Answer:  a resounding &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221;.</p>
<p>To be honest, I don&#8217;t trust testimonials unless I know the person giving the testament.  If you didn&#8217;t know me and saw an advertisement with an endorsement from &#8220;Carolyn Manning, Pennsylvania&#8221; what in the world would induce you to believe it?  Without personal knowledge, you don&#8217;t even know if there&#8217;s a person by that name living in Pennsylvania.</p>
<p>A public review is an alternative, but that isn&#8217;t without it&#8217;s jade, either.  Many reviews are sponsored, therefore we&#8217;re back to &#8220;believe it or not&#8221;.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m close to being right, that leaves us with the phrase you like so much:  a personal flavor using the writer&#8217;s natural flair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-50439</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-50439</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Carolyn Manning&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for explaining. You have a good point; only some personal touch of the actual person managing or creating the advertising message can usually go through, an advertisement, as being something on a personal level, and even that may be limited or non-existent, or available in forms more influenced by non-personal things than a personal touch. I wonder if advertisements can be made more personal by not only including personal stories of customers supporting a product but also doing otherwise.

"&lt;em&gt;A personal flavor using the writer's natural flair&lt;/em&gt;" - very interesting wording. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Carolyn Manning</strong>, thanks for explaining. You have a good point; only some personal touch of the actual person managing or creating the advertising message can usually go through, an advertisement, as being something on a personal level, and even that may be limited or non-existent, or available in forms more influenced by non-personal things than a personal touch. I wonder if advertisements can be made more personal by not only including personal stories of customers supporting a product but also doing otherwise.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>A personal flavor using the writer&#8217;s natural flair</em>&#8221; - very interesting wording. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Manning</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-49957</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-49957</guid>
		<description>Bes, I meant more of a personal flavor, not necessarily personal opinion.  But I think we're both talking about the same thing.  Particularly with advertising, there isn't too much other than the writer's natural flair that can be added.  Now that I think about it, corporate writing holds much of the same restriction, but maybe not quite so hard and fast.

Yep, that's where I was going:  a personal flavor using the writer's natural flair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bes, I meant more of a personal flavor, not necessarily personal opinion.  But I think we&#8217;re both talking about the same thing.  Particularly with advertising, there isn&#8217;t too much other than the writer&#8217;s natural flair that can be added.  Now that I think about it, corporate writing holds much of the same restriction, but maybe not quite so hard and fast.</p>
<p>Yep, that&#8217;s where I was going:  a personal flavor using the writer&#8217;s natural flair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-49945</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-49945</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BeachBum&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for the comment. So in your view, any kind of a decent blog that is written in a personal style is better than producing that blog in a completely commercial or non-personal manner? :)

True, it can be nice to fully express your feelings on a topic, or most of them, so that one can cover all the bases. However, many bloggers working for some corporations tend to be biased in their personal opinions, since they want to promote their company and also because they do not want to upset their employers. What do you think about many corporations not preferring employees to talk negatively about their products?

&lt;strong&gt;Carolyn Manning&lt;/strong&gt;, thank you for commenting. :) Sure, corporate and news blogs can add a personal touch on a little bit formal level, though I usually notice that the ones already doing that are biased because they promote their work and products.

A good next question should be: should a personal injection be balanced, or can it be biased since it still adds a personal opinion to things? Would being biased in one's writing to promote his or her company, even if it is personal writing, be the same as a corporate writing ot an advertising since they are tend and aim to promote a certain brand and product?

&lt;strong&gt;MT of MindTweaks&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for the comment too. I also keep up with some friends through their personal journals.

By just the facts blogs, do you mean very blogs with very specialized niches talking about something very specific?

Your comment is a good example of how the title and the opening content can help both personal and non-personal blogging articles and posts.

Yes, I think see what you mean. :) Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BeachBum</strong>, thanks for the comment. So in your view, any kind of a decent blog that is written in a personal style is better than producing that blog in a completely commercial or non-personal manner? <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>True, it can be nice to fully express your feelings on a topic, or most of them, so that one can cover all the bases. However, many bloggers working for some corporations tend to be biased in their personal opinions, since they want to promote their company and also because they do not want to upset their employers. What do you think about many corporations not preferring employees to talk negatively about their products?</p>
<p><strong>Carolyn Manning</strong>, thank you for commenting. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Sure, corporate and news blogs can add a personal touch on a little bit formal level, though I usually notice that the ones already doing that are biased because they promote their work and products.</p>
<p>A good next question should be: should a personal injection be balanced, or can it be biased since it still adds a personal opinion to things? Would being biased in one&#8217;s writing to promote his or her company, even if it is personal writing, be the same as a corporate writing ot an advertising since they are tend and aim to promote a certain brand and product?</p>
<p><strong>MT of MindTweaks</strong>, thanks for the comment too. I also keep up with some friends through their personal journals.</p>
<p>By just the facts blogs, do you mean very blogs with very specialized niches talking about something very specific?</p>
<p>Your comment is a good example of how the title and the opening content can help both personal and non-personal blogging articles and posts.</p>
<p>Yes, I think see what you mean. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT of MindTweaks</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-49232</link>
		<dc:creator>MT of MindTweaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-49232</guid>
		<description>I tend to read more of the "hybrid" type....  niche blogs with both purpose and individual style.  I do subscribe to a few personal journal types, to keep up with friends, and a few just-the-facts blogs ....  but I with both types, I find I skim titles, and read an entry here and there.   Its personality with a point that draws me in.    


 : ) (personality) ---&#62;(point)

See what I mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to read more of the &#8220;hybrid&#8221; type&#8230;.  niche blogs with both purpose and individual style.  I do subscribe to a few personal journal types, to keep up with friends, and a few just-the-facts blogs &#8230;.  but I with both types, I find I skim titles, and read an entry here and there.   Its personality with a point that draws me in.    </p>
<p> : ) (personality) &#8212;&gt;(point)</p>
<p>See what I mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Manning</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-49195</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-49195</guid>
		<description>Even corporate blogs and those strictly dedicated to reporting news can adopt a personal touch, although not so much as others.  I agree with BeachBum about meaning and emotion.  We are, after all, people writing for people.  Why bother if we ignore the human element?

Short answer:  a bit of personal injection is preferable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even corporate blogs and those strictly dedicated to reporting news can adopt a personal touch, although not so much as others.  I agree with BeachBum about meaning and emotion.  We are, after all, people writing for people.  Why bother if we ignore the human element?</p>
<p>Short answer:  a bit of personal injection is preferable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeachBum</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs#comment-48964</link>
		<dc:creator>BeachBum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/question-do-you-prefer-non-personal-blogs-over-personal-blogs/#comment-48964</guid>
		<description>I like blogs that are written with a personal style.  Words on a screen have meaning and emotion.  Even better when the person writing can freely express their feelings and not have to hide behind a "corporate" cover.

BeachBum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like blogs that are written with a personal style.  Words on a screen have meaning and emotion.  Even better when the person writing can freely express their feelings and not have to hide behind a &#8220;corporate&#8221; cover.</p>
<p>BeachBum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
