<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misinterpreting things online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online</link>
	<description>Analysis of Reason - Finding out the reasons for the insanity in the universe</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: flower pictures</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-174652</link>
		<dc:creator>flower pictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-174652</guid>
		<description>even for  suggestive photographers, their wish comes in first. interpretation of eroticism in her flower-pictures came from other people , some people understand some dont</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even for  suggestive photographers, their wish comes in first. interpretation of eroticism in her flower-pictures came from other people , some people understand some dont</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-12208</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-12208</guid>
		<description>Sawai -- &gt; I see what you mean. Text messaging is almost the same, sine it's not face to face, and thus open to lots of conclusions and interpretations. =\

Ally -- &gt; Good point about flame wars. Thanks for the example; that explains things more. Thanks for the nice comment also.

RIck -- &gt; Interesting point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sawai &#8212; > I see what you mean. Text messaging is almost the same, sine it&#8217;s not face to face, and thus open to lots of conclusions and interpretations. =\</p>
<p>Ally &#8212; > Good point about flame wars. Thanks for the example; that explains things more. Thanks for the nice comment also.</p>
<p>RIck &#8212; > Interesting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIck</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-10612</link>
		<dc:creator>RIck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-10612</guid>
		<description>Yes. Interpretation says more about the person than about the subject. 

"Nothing is good or bad, but thinking makes it so." -- Wm. Shakespeare</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Interpretation says more about the person than about the subject. </p>
<p>&#8220;Nothing is good or bad, but thinking makes it so.&#8221; &#8212; Wm. Shakespeare</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-10103</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-10103</guid>
		<description>Yeah, difficult - so many flame wars start because people miscommunicate.

I saw an interview with Georgia O'Keefe where she was saying that all the interpretation of eroticism in her flower-pictures came from other people - she painted the flowers as she saw them. You get what you get from any picture because of what's in your mind already.  I think this is a lovely photo and if some people choose to see hidden meanings in it, that's their interpretation of it, not the picture itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, difficult - so many flame wars start because people miscommunicate.</p>
<p>I saw an interview with Georgia O&#8217;Keefe where she was saying that all the interpretation of eroticism in her flower-pictures came from other people - she painted the flowers as she saw them. You get what you get from any picture because of what&#8217;s in your mind already.  I think this is a lovely photo and if some people choose to see hidden meanings in it, that&#8217;s their interpretation of it, not the picture itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sawai</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-9727</link>
		<dc:creator>sawai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-9727</guid>
		<description>You wrote exactly what I had thought of, after reading the title.

I am a victim of a lot of mis-interpretations by a lot of my best friends.
all because of text chatting...
I hate text chatting...

I really wish I could write more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote exactly what I had thought of, after reading the title.</p>
<p>I am a victim of a lot of mis-interpretations by a lot of my best friends.<br />
all because of text chatting&#8230;<br />
I hate text chatting&#8230;</p>
<p>I really wish I could write more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-9724</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-9724</guid>
		<description>I think I know exactly what you're talking about. 0_0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I know exactly what you&#8217;re talking about. 0_0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valerie</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-9707</link>
		<dc:creator>valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-9707</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... yeah, and along the same lines, people taking completely wrong the thing you've said.  Ahem.  Grr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; yeah, and along the same lines, people taking completely wrong the thing you&#8217;ve said.  Ahem.  Grr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-9652</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-9652</guid>
		<description>Manik -- &gt; Thanks. Glad you like it. :)

Chau -- &gt; :D Thank you. Hmmm, I have to ask you more about that. :p

Jerine -- &gt; Yes, heh. :p The route you suggest is perfectly fine and should be done as we should express what we think in an effective manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manik &#8212; > Thanks. Glad you like it. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Chau &#8212; > <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> Thank you. Hmmm, I have to ask you more about that. :p</p>
<p>Jerine &#8212; > Yes, heh. :p The route you suggest is perfectly fine and should be done as we should express what we think in an effective manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerine</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-9626</link>
		<dc:creator>jerine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-9626</guid>
		<description>This post reminds me of our previous conversation. I can't help but to laugh. It seems to me pretty ridiculous. Honestly, I think the photo is quite indecent but I prefer to tell you personally than to publicize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post reminds me of our previous conversation. I can&#8217;t help but to laugh. It seems to me pretty ridiculous. Honestly, I think the photo is quite indecent but I prefer to tell you personally than to publicize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chau</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-9600</link>
		<dc:creator>Chau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-9600</guid>
		<description>Good entry, Bes!

I know what you mean about misinterpretations, though... *sigh*...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good entry, Bes!</p>
<p>I know what you mean about misinterpretations, though&#8230; *sigh*&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manik</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/misinterpreting-things-online#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>Manik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/item/2006/12/13/misinterpreting-things-online/#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>Even if the photograph is suggestive, i think it is tastefully done.
Ppl have a tough time accepting facts and coming to terms with reality, there is nothing disgusting about the human anatomy that one should be grossed about...love ur pics on flickr..keep up the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the photograph is suggestive, i think it is tastefully done.<br />
Ppl have a tough time accepting facts and coming to terms with reality, there is nothing disgusting about the human anatomy that one should be grossed about&#8230;love ur pics on flickr..keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
