Check out my trzain eBay auctions!
Now playing: 10 rude things waiters do to you.
Analysis of Reason – Finding out the reasons for the insanity in the universe
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Products Page
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Register


  • You are here:

    Blog > Online > Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1

  • 4 related articles

    • Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 2
    • Status Updates : What I am/was up to on last week – 2009-03-23
    • Flickr invitation from Val
    • Knowledge and sales
  • Find/add me on...

    • Brightkite
    • Delicious
    • Facebook
    • Flickr
    • Jaiku
    • Kwippy
    • LiveJournal
    • Multiply
    • MySpace
    • Plurk
    • Twitter
    • Tumblr
    • Yahoo 360
    • Yelp
    • YouAre
  • Categories

    • General (395)
    • Life (114)
    • Media (38)
    • Online (215)
    • Ping.fm (1)
    • Twitter Universe (187)

  • Subscribe to RSS feeds

    • E-mail subscription
    • Direct RSS [click the image below please] :
      The Reasoner RSS Feed
    • Direct RSS Link : The Reasoner RSS Feed
  • People on this site right now

    753 Users on The Reasoner at this moment.

  • Like this site? Please support it! :)

    Do you like what you see, read, and feel? Then please help this site by contributing and donating anything any amount you wish!

Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1

Posted in Online by Bes on Mar 19, 2008

This entry is part 2 of 1 in the series Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie

This is part of the series:

  • Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1

73/365Hi everyone. Today I would like to present to you an interview of a friend of mine, Valerie from Spoken-For.org . A lot of you may know Valerie already, and may find this interview interesting. Those of you who have never heard of Valerie or her site may come to know her through this interview also.

This interview revolves around the concept of commenting and how one should react to commentors and comments, and how comments can shape your blog and you. This is the first part of the interview. I conducted this interview via e-mail and online chats – thank you Valerie for allowing me to bug you through these two ways.

This is part 1 of the interview, from a total of two parts. Part 2 will be published soon.

Interview with Valerie of Spoken-For – Part 1

  1. How did you start your site? What is it about?

    I guess you could say my blog has its beginnings in late 2002, not long after I found out I was pregnant. I had seen a friend do something similar, and I thought it was a great idea to add a section to my already existing (genealogy) site where friends and relatives who aren’t around can get updates on the pregnancy, photos, etc. This carried on through the whole pregnancy and I sort of quit there.

    But in October 2003 when I had a three-month-old and some extra time on my hands, I thought I’d pick it all back up. I had such great fun at it all that I got the blog its own domain name and as time progressed I was getting more attention from strangers than family and it turned into more of a diary and lifelog than just baby updates and photos.

    Also, when I started, the site was just an html page that I updated with the dates and so there were no direct comments on entries. I had one page where people could leave a message and still have those posts. When I moved to actual blogging, I later had to track down those old posts via archive.org and them. I think I lost some of them in the process.

  2. How do readers play a part in your site?

    I think I stand in the middle with this. On one hand, I really do not care if people visit and leave comments – after all, that’s how I started, never dreaming anyone who did not already know me would care and there are lots of things that I post that I just know will bore everyone else but I write them down anyway for me – but on the other hand, it does matter to me. Over the course of time, I’ve met some really great people through this whole blogging thing and I often really desire their input and validation. They
    are real friends to me, not just people who come and go, and I highly value their friendship and opinions.

    There have even been several occasions when I’ve asked for advice regarding my candle business, what scents people would be interested in. Both regular visitors and one-time visitors were very helpful in helping me choose scents to make that would suit a variety of people and not just myself.

  3. When you started the site, what did you expect from the readers? Were those expectations met?

    Since I had started it all as a family thing, I had expected my family to at least pay somewhat attention. However, I wasn’t so lucky in that respect, especially after I got the separate domain for the site. My family (this includes uncles, aunts, cousins, etc.) sort of missed the change altogether (not that they had paid attention much past the initial pregnancy updates anyway) and, as far as I’m aware, none of them visit today, or even know the site exists, with the exception of two in-laws. What I ended up with was a couple of visitors for several months until other bloggers began to visit and make their presence known.

  4. You get a lot of supportive comments, and you also get a lot of critical comments and comments which attack you personally. You are one of the bloggers who has sparked a lot of opposition due to your posts regarding Geek Squad and DHL. What do you think of the people who support you and the people who disagree with you on posts revolving around those companies? Has any company directly or indirectly retaliated because of your posts?

    When it comes to posting the ugly side of a company or pointing out a company’s mistakes, you’re bound to gather attention. There seems to be four types of people that respond to these posts. There are the friends who know I’m not just making stuff up and they offer their support for me, and indignation towards whatever it may be that has caused my grief.

    The second group is made up of those who have had their own problems with the company. They find me via search engines or other people who have shared their stories and linked me. They tend to just want someone to rant to about their issues, sometimes they want advice on where to turn next; they’re typically the biggest group of the four.

    The third group is typically smallest, the people who say they’ve not had a problem at all with that company, “but, whatever.” The fourth group is usually the most fun. These people are, for some reason or another, outraged that I would dare say anything negative about a large company; many admit to being employees of the company while others’ IP addresses tell on them. While some are nice and can agree to disagree, in my experience, most of these people take it personally and then proceed to act as such. However, they mostly seem to be lone gunmen. I have never had a company directly contact me about my postings nor are my postings wide-spread enough for me to be recognized when I am forced to deal with these companies “in real life” (especially since by the time I’m posting about them, I’m typically already boycotting them).

    I have had two occasions where an employee and then a different employee’s wife went to other, unrelated articles in my blog with other nasty comments but that’s been the worst of it. I don’t really have a general opinion regarding the people who agree or
    disagree with me, they are all given equal chance and profane language is edited out no matter which side of the fence they’re on. Also, I don’t respond to every comment. Sometimes I ignore comments, good or bad, depending on the amount of time I have.

  5. Has earning money online played any part in dealing with commentors? For example, would you turn off comments if advertisers paid you to do so, or would you allow certain personal attacking comments if you were paid to leave the comments on and uncensored on some posts?

    I have personally never heard of either of those scenarios and they present an interesting dilemma. I think I would have to take that in a case-by-case basis. How much money are you offering? Smile I really don’t think I could answer this question until I were to know all the specifics.

  6. Have your blogging, other online or offline habits or behavior changed because of either the supportive or criticizing comments?

    Someone who visits my blog and calls me a nasty name because of my view of the Geek Squad doesn’t have me lying awake at night upset. At most I may wonder for a few minutes on how I should respond, if at all, but then I move on. However, there have been times where I have taken to heart things that commentors have said. Usually this is in regards to a parenting issue I feel lost at or some other life issue. My actions may be affirmed, and I will continue at how I am behaving, or someone may offer advice and I will try that out, too. The only real things that have changed have been due to an online stalker and a friend whom I had a falling out with.

    Because of those situations, I have taken many things private (only visible to friends and family I trust, or even sometimes just myself) that may have otherwise been posted publicly.

  7. How do you deal with such comments, and commentors, that attack you personally?

    I pretty much handle this on a case-by-case basis. I think it also depends on the mood I’m in – haha (I /am/ after all, a woman).
    Typically, because of the moderation rules I employ, these comments will go straight to moderation (dependent upon how old the post is). If I feel I have something substantial or witty to say back to this person (or even if I have nothing to say), I may approve the comment and reply (or say nothing). If I’m unsure about it, I might check to see if they’ve subscribed to the comments or if they’ve left what appears to be a real name, email address, and/or URL.

    In other words, I’m more apt to give answer if they really seem interested in one rather than bash-and-run. If I get the feeling they’re bash-and-run and the comment is extraordinarily mean and/or full of profanity, there’s a good chance I’ll just delete it (especially when they have nothing new to add to the conversation like is common on the Geek Squad thread where they all have the same points/complaints).

From comments to commentors, Spoken-For keeps on speaking

From the above interview and the links presented within it, you can see a lot of trends that go along with that I said in a previous post titled “Disagree with arguments, not with people who argue.” Also, one can see from Valerie’s experience above as to how the shape of a site can change from being a simple website to being a blog, yet the function of the site remains exactly the same: to allow for a place for Valerie to express herself. What do you think?

Do you have any questions?

That is all for this time. Smile Stay tuned for the next part of the interview soon, where I asked Valerie about the possibility of closing down comments section, the comparison between her blog and her online business, online stalkers, and more.

Please let me or Valerie know about any opinions, thoughts, or questions you can think of either by e-mailing me or Valerie, or by leaving a comment below.

Thank you for reading. Smile

  • Tweet This!
  • Share this on Facebook
  • Share this on FriendFeed
  • Post this to MySpace
  • Share this on Linkedin
  • Share this on Blinklist
  • Share this on del.icio.us
  • Digg this!
  • Post this on Diigo
  • Share this on Reddit
  • Submit this to Netvibes
  • Buzz up!
  • Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon
  • Submit this to Script & Style
  • Share this on Technorati
  • Share this on Mixx
  • Submit this to DesignFloat
  • Email this to a friend?
  • Suggest this article to ToMuse
  • Subscribe to the comments for this post?
  • Seed this on Newsvine
  • Share this on Devmarks
  • Add this to Google Bookmarks
  • Add this to Mister Wong
  • Add this to Izeby
  • Share this on Tipd
  • Share this on PFBuzz
  • Mark this on BlogMarks
  • Submit this to Twittley
  • Share this on Fwisp
  • Moo this on DesignMoo!
  • Share this on BobrDobr
  • Add this to Yandex.Bookmarks
  • Add this to Memory.ru
  • Add this to 100 bookmarks
  • Add this to MyPlace
  • Submit this to Hacker News
  • Send this page to Print Friendly
  • Bump this on DesignBump
  • Add this to Ning
  • Post this to Identica
  • Save this to Xerpi
  • Share this on Wikio
  • Tip this to TechMeme
  • Sphinn this on Sphinn
  • Post this to Posterous
  • Grind this! on Global Grind
  • Ping this on Ping.fm
  • Submit this to NUjij
  • Submit this to eKudos
  • Submit this to Netvouz
  • Share this on Fleck
  • Share this on Blogosphere News

[View academic citations to cite this article]
[Hide academic citations]
AMA citation:
Zain B. Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1. The Reasoner. 2008. Available at: http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/interview-with-spoken-fororg-creator-valerie-part-1. Accessed March 18, 2010.
APA citation:
Zain, Bes. (2008). Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1. Retrieved March 18, 2010, from The Reasoner Web site: http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/interview-with-spoken-fororg-creator-valerie-part-1
Chicago citation:
Zain, Bes. 2008. Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1. The Reasoner. http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/interview-with-spoken-fororg-creator-valerie-part-1 (accessed March 18, 2010).
Harvard citation:
Zain, B 2008, Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1, The Reasoner. Retrieved March 18, 2010, from <http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/interview-with-spoken-fororg-creator-valerie-part-1>
MLA citation:
Zain, Bes. "Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1." 19 Mar. 2008. The Reasoner. Accessed 18 Mar. 2010. <http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/interview-with-spoken-fororg-creator-valerie-part-1>
For more information on this plugin, visit Academic Citations.





If you like this article, please subscribe to the RSS feed or you can subscribe via e-mail.



  •   • Print This Post Print This Post   • Trackback URI   • Comments RSS

Tags: interview, Online, people, series, spoken-for, trends




9 Comments to “ Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1 .” Please leave a comment below, thank you.


  1. # 1
    Music.Podfire.orgNo Gravatar (1 comments)
    :
    ( March 20th, 2008 at 9:15 am )

    I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog.

    Reply & quote this


  2. # 2
    JohnNo Gravatar (11 comments)
    :
    ( March 20th, 2008 at 10:21 am )

    Isn’t the above comment a spam? A keyword in nick and no contribution.

    Reply & quote this


  3. # 3
    GreeNo Gravatar (1 comments)
    :
    ( March 20th, 2008 at 2:34 pm )

    I really like the attitude that Valerie has to bloging.
    She sais:

    On one hand, I really do not care if people visit and leave comments – after all, that’s how I started, never dreaming anyone who did not already know me would care and there are lots of things that I post that I just know will bore everyone else but I write them down anyway for me – but on the other hand, it does matter to me.

    Isn’t it the real path to sincer blogging? Writing what YOU like, but not what the readers should like. Earlier or later you’ll find your audience anyway, because there are enough people around that may share your way of thinking. All you need is to to keep gong with your blog and dont give up. It’s all rewarded.

    A question for next part of interview:
    How much time approximately do you spend on blogging? HOurs/day.. I mean, nt only posting, but also reading comments, preparing materials and everything related to it.

    Reply & quote this


  4. # 4
    Adam HymanNo Gravatar (1 comments)
    :
    ( March 26th, 2008 at 3:04 pm )

    I think the first comment is spam.

    Have you read Atlas Shrugged? It deals a lot with REASON. You should do a post on your thoughts about it.

    Reply & quote this


  5. # 5
    MikeNo Gravatar (13 comments)
    :
    ( April 1st, 2008 at 10:22 am )

    The interview is very remarkable ,as it tells out how to communicate with others and comment and react upon the comments. I’m just blank and don’t have words of appreciation. But it was very interesting.

    Reply & quote this


  6. # 6
    Marc KleinNo Gravatar (2 comments)
    :
    ( June 1st, 2008 at 2:46 am )

    Really useful knowledge about keyboard. It can also be defined as a modernized typewriter .It acts as input devices for computer .Just imagine life without keyboard?????????

    Reply & quote this


  7. # 7
    ersyNo Gravatar (2 comments)
    :
    ( July 3rd, 2009 at 10:09 am )

    nice post friend..But this formule is easy.

    Reply & quote this


  8. # 8
    BenNo Gravatar (4 comments)
    :
    ( September 6th, 2009 at 2:02 am )

    Nice article. Nice attitude to comment.

    Reply & quote this


  9. What others are saying about this article elsewhere

    1. Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie - Part 2 | The Reasoner says:
      March 18, 2009 at 11:28 pm

      [...] Interview with Spoken-For.org creator, Valerie – Part 1Flickr invitation from ValKnowledge and sales3 random annoying things people say and do without thinking much [...]

      Reply

Please leave a comment below, thank you. You will be able to edit your posted comment for up to one hour (60 minutes).

You can use these tags in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




   

  [I will still try to respond to everything/everyone, as usual :) ]

Click to Insert Smiley

SmileBig SmileGrinLaughLOLFrownBig FrownWinkKissRazzAngelAngryReally AngryConfusedNeutralThinkingChicCoolNerdSillyDrunken RazzMad RazzEvil GrinMeanPissed OffReally PissedCurseShoutGrit TeethCryWeepSide FrownWiltSmugDisdainRoll EyesSarcasmLoserTalk to the HandShyBeat UpPainShameBeautyBlushCuteLashesKissingKiss BlowKissedHeh!SmirkSnickerGiggleIn LoveDroolEek!ShockSickSuspenseTrembleDazedHypnotizedFoot in MouthMoney MouthQuietShut MouthDOH!IDKQuestionLyingStruggleSweatStopByeGo AwayWavingTime OutCall MeOn the PhoneMeetingSecretHandshakeHigh FiveHug LeftHug RightClapDanceJumpFingers CrossedVictoryYawnSleepyPrayWorshipWaitingAlienClownCowboyCyclopsDevilDoctorFemale FighterMale FighterMohawkMusicPartyPirateSkywalkerSnowmanSoldierGhostSkeletonEatStarvingVampireZombie KillerBunnyCatCat 2ChickChickenChicken 2CowCow 2DogDog 2DuckGoatHippoKoalaLionMonkeyMonkey 2MousePandaPigPig 2SheepSheep 2ReindeerSnailTigerTurtleFemaleMaleHeartBroken HeartRoseDead RosePeaceYin YangUS FlagMoonStarSunCloudyRainThunderUmbrellaRainbowMusic NoteYesNoAirplaneCarIslandAnnouncebrbBeerDrinkLiquorCakeCoffeePizzaWatermelonBowlPlateCanMailCellPhoneCameraFilmTVClockLampSearchCoinsComputerConsolePresentSoccerCloverPumpkinBombHammerKnifeHandcuffsPillPoopCigarette

Cancel reply

Send To Twitter What's CommenTwitter?

Subscribe without commenting



^ back to top

Copyright © 1995 - 2009 Bes Z, The Reasoner. All Rights Reserved unless otherwise noted.