<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 offline stereotypes you can use to stereotype bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers</link>
	<description>Analysis of Reason - Finding out the reasons for the insanity in the universe</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48907</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48907</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Raf&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for the comment. I have to be scared now, so that I don't dissappoint you in my future writing. :)

"Think Like Them" is indeed interesting, and I &lt;a href="http://thinklikethem.com/why-you-rarely-speak-the-truth/#comment-9" title="Bes Zain replies to a post about Truth and Fear by Joshua on Think Like Them Blog"&gt;commented on that post&lt;/a&gt; with something small to get started right before your comment there. ;)

&lt;strong&gt;Joshua&lt;/strong&gt;, thanks for the comment and coming over. It's nice to meet you too. :) 

About Raf not working for you, Raf may really be liking  really like your site because of your interesting posts and questions.

Regarding your question, I think "&lt;em&gt;stereotypes and preconceived notions&lt;/em&gt;" are indeed part of our mechanism, though we learn such traits because of the way we are raised and what we learn by observing others around us, and through elements like books and television.

It can be hard to switch off such a mechanism in order to be less biased, but it is possible. I think the trick is not to generalize. Something about a character, ethnicity, some element like income, or even religion or something completely random, may prompt us to generalize someone, but I think if we can stop that generalization from being imprinted completely into our minds, we can slowly have a way to remove the automation we have when we judge people right on the spot. 

"&lt;em&gt;Do you love rap music?&lt;/em&gt;" because of being black, "&lt;em&gt;Are you from China?&lt;/em&gt;" because of looking "&lt;em&gt;oriental&lt;/em&gt;", "&lt;em&gt;Are you from the south?&lt;/em&gt;" because of supporting about religion and government too much, "&lt;em&gt;Are you gay?&lt;/em&gt;" because of not being bothered by gay people, and so on and so on. All these things come from some past experience, even if those experiences weren't our own and we observed them in some manner. I think if we make an effort, we can switch off such basic instincts. Even "&lt;em&gt;You are a personal blogger and simply talking about life. You can't compete with any of the A-listers&lt;/em&gt;" is a stereotype because of thinking "&lt;em&gt;So far, I don't know any personal blogger who makes money, and money in my view makes A-listers become famous, thus Personal Bloggers are not famous, and if one isn't famous, one is not important.&lt;/em&gt;"

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Raf</strong>, thanks for the comment. I have to be scared now, so that I don&#8217;t dissappoint you in my future writing. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;Think Like Them&#8221; is indeed interesting, and I <a href="http://thinklikethem.com/why-you-rarely-speak-the-truth/#comment-9" title="Bes Zain replies to a post about Truth and Fear by Joshua on Think Like Them Blog">commented on that post</a> with something small to get started right before your comment there. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Joshua</strong>, thanks for the comment and coming over. It&#8217;s nice to meet you too. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>About Raf not working for you, Raf may really be liking  really like your site because of your interesting posts and questions.</p>
<p>Regarding your question, I think &#8220;<em>stereotypes and preconceived notions</em>&#8221; are indeed part of our mechanism, though we learn such traits because of the way we are raised and what we learn by observing others around us, and through elements like books and television.</p>
<p>It can be hard to switch off such a mechanism in order to be less biased, but it is possible. I think the trick is not to generalize. Something about a character, ethnicity, some element like income, or even religion or something completely random, may prompt us to generalize someone, but I think if we can stop that generalization from being imprinted completely into our minds, we can slowly have a way to remove the automation we have when we judge people right on the spot. </p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Do you love rap music?</em>&#8221; because of being black, &#8220;<em>Are you from China?</em>&#8221; because of looking &#8220;<em>oriental</em>&#8220;, &#8220;<em>Are you from the south?</em>&#8221; because of supporting about religion and government too much, &#8220;<em>Are you gay?</em>&#8221; because of not being bothered by gay people, and so on and so on. All these things come from some past experience, even if those experiences weren&#8217;t our own and we observed them in some manner. I think if we make an effort, we can switch off such basic instincts. Even &#8220;<em>You are a personal blogger and simply talking about life. You can&#8217;t compete with any of the A-listers</em>&#8221; is a stereotype because of thinking &#8220;<em>So far, I don&#8217;t know any personal blogger who makes money, and money in my view makes A-listers become famous, thus Personal Bloggers are not famous, and if one isn&#8217;t famous, one is not important.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48748</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48748</guid>
		<description>What do you think about stereotypes and preconceived notions as being part of our mechanism for quick judgement of people and situations?

Good to meet you!

(I swear Raf does not work for me!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about stereotypes and preconceived notions as being part of our mechanism for quick judgement of people and situations?</p>
<p>Good to meet you!</p>
<p>(I swear Raf does not work for me!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48675</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48675</guid>
		<description>no problem. You have a cool way of analyzing. I'd love to read more. :)  By the way, this is another site, the writer gave, to me, a lot of thinking in his article which interests me. www.thinklikethem.com 

read the latest which contains the part " we fear something we don't understand". maybe you want to write something on it, I'll be glad to read  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no problem. You have a cool way of analyzing. I&#8217;d love to read more. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  By the way, this is another site, the writer gave, to me, a lot of thinking in his article which interests me. <a href="http://www.thinklikethem.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.thinklikethem.com'>http://www.thinklikethem.com</a> </p>
<p>read the latest which contains the part &#8221; we fear something we don&#8217;t understand&#8221;. maybe you want to write something on it, I&#8217;ll be glad to read  <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48674</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48674</guid>
		<description>no problem. You hav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no problem. You hav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48672</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48672</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Casablanca travel&lt;/strong&gt;, thank you. I really appreciate your kind words. Did you like the offline-online comparison here more, or some other element? :)

&lt;strong&gt;BeachBum&lt;/strong&gt;, thank you for the comment. Thank you for the encouragement. :)

I have to re-design my site a bit too. I have considered advertising before and have been approached by some advertisors too, but so far, I cannot think of a way to blend advertising into this site in a non-annoying manner.

Nice business name, by the way. :)

&lt;strong&gt;Raf&lt;/strong&gt;, thank you for the comment too, and I am honored that you and the others find this post interesting.

That is indeed interesting, and I am glad you edited your comment to include that additional information. I think it is better to think about a topic and consider it in a relevant perspective, instead of assuming "&lt;em&gt;Wow, this topic is boring because it talks about boring things, let's move on.&lt;/em&gt;" Of course, there is nothing wrong with moving on, and sometimes ignoring some blogs can be a good thing since one is not obligated to read any blog I think.

However, like you said, if there is a way for us to indeed pay attention, we can find even the most remote articles to benefit or make us think in some manner.

Thanks for sharing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Casablanca travel</strong>, thank you. I really appreciate your kind words. Did you like the offline-online comparison here more, or some other element? <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>BeachBum</strong>, thank you for the comment. Thank you for the encouragement. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have to re-design my site a bit too. I have considered advertising before and have been approached by some advertisors too, but so far, I cannot think of a way to blend advertising into this site in a non-annoying manner.</p>
<p>Nice business name, by the way. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Raf</strong>, thank you for the comment too, and I am honored that you and the others find this post interesting.</p>
<p>That is indeed interesting, and I am glad you edited your comment to include that additional information. I think it is better to think about a topic and consider it in a relevant perspective, instead of assuming &#8220;<em>Wow, this topic is boring because it talks about boring things, let&#8217;s move on.</em>&#8221; Of course, there is nothing wrong with moving on, and sometimes ignoring some blogs can be a good thing since one is not obligated to read any blog I think.</p>
<p>However, like you said, if there is a way for us to indeed pay attention, we can find even the most remote articles to benefit or make us think in some manner.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing. <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48648</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48648</guid>
		<description>had to say, this is a good article. I'll bookmark your site :) Edited : and o'ya, for the second one, for me it was true, I really thought that way. But after a few months reading through my frens' blog, my perspective changed. It was fun and glad to hear and to know their stories. Even some helped me dealing with my own life, my own problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>had to say, this is a good article. I&#8217;ll bookmark your site <img src='http://thereasoner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Edited : and o&#8217;ya, for the second one, for me it was true, I really thought that way. But after a few months reading through my frens&#8217; blog, my perspective changed. It was fun and glad to hear and to know their stories. Even some helped me dealing with my own life, my own problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeachBum</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48507</link>
		<dc:creator>BeachBum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48507</guid>
		<description>Very good post.  I guess I should re-design my blog. I'm impressed that you don't monitize your blog.

Keep up the interesting posts!

BeachBum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post.  I guess I should re-design my blog. I&#8217;m impressed that you don&#8217;t monitize your blog.</p>
<p>Keep up the interesting posts!</p>
<p>BeachBum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casablanca travel</title>
		<link>http://thereasoner.com/articles/online/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/comment-page-1#comment-48414</link>
		<dc:creator>Casablanca travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thereasoner.com/blog/5-offline-stereotypes-you-can-use-to-stereotype-bloggers/#comment-48414</guid>
		<description>Good analysis! This is one of the few entries I find significant.  It shows that you've been doing  blog observation lately.  Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis! This is one of the few entries I find significant.  It shows that you&#8217;ve been doing  blog observation lately.  Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
