Modern rock painting & ancient art
We’re always in search for the best looking “thing” whenever we shop for majority of the things in our life. When we go out to buy clothes, we look for things that appears nice and will match different kinds and colors of shoes. When we shop for a car, we always look for a car that’s good in a number of ways; a car should better fuel consumption, better handling on the road, and also, a better look than your current car or something you’ve seen. Even online we’re always in search of better looking layouts and themes for web sites and web pages, along with better content.
I came across the concept of rock painting of today a while back, and it was interesting to see how it is viewed and treated.
Rock painting is supposedly and somehow the same concept that people used to paint in the caves thousands of years ago. One of the forms used today is painting directly on the rocks, making the rock the canvas. This way, you use the same traditional space used by people in previous civilizations to paint something. Another form of rock painting is the Painted Rocks, in which the artist takes a rock and turns the actual rock into a visually identifiable [and small symbol] of an actual “thing.” This is really interesting to me, as the transformation is made possible not through cutting the stone as in the case of sculptures, but through painting on the rock itself. For example, the sneaker image in this paragraph is an actual rock which has only been painted upon. I find such art really beautiful, as it requires a lot of thinking when taking a shape that is already there, and turning it through painting colors into an object of a similar shape.
While materialistic things get newer and different faces everyday, art itself has gotten less attention from many people as time has passed. I find myself in many situations where I appreciate art based on who the artist is, or what a small placard says right next to a sculpture, until I realize what I’m doing. Art of today has somehow moved a little bit back into the stage that was the norm a couple of centuries ago, when art could only be “appreciated” and bought by the elite. While people do invest a lot of time in unique kinds of art these days to make art that is personal and affordable [either for purchase or to simply appreciate], most of the time these go unnoticed and unappreciated compared to the attention art from the previous centuries receives today. I think that these small forms of art, even though they may look too basic or “strange” compared to the works of some famous painters, should be promoted more, no matter how small or different such art might be compared to the mainstream art that is appreciated today [which consists mostly of art from the previous centuries]. We can thus appreciate art and keep coming up with ways which promote the concept of art itself, and not the concept of commercialization of art in which the form of art is based upon who purchases it.



( September 3rd, 2005 at 5:41 pm )
Everyone is out for the best, a lot of people don’t really take a look at anything but the best. But sometimes, it is worthwhile to look at whats not yet the best. To promote it, make it better.
That’s very interesting, using a rock directly to make a painting, very interesting. Must be hard, takes probably a lot of practice, but all together looks fun and funky. I’d like to try that out one day. ;D
That sneacker looks very very real, it looked so real that the first time I saw it when I clicked on your link, I thought a squashed sneaker? Intersting.
Art is actually, get more and more attention nowadays, a lot of attention. There’s many kinds of arts, while some are still new and unfinished, some old and antiqued, and so fresh and amazing, that only the greatest type is getting the attention, while the rest is packed down, ready to be discovered again soon. (Did that make sense?)
( September 3rd, 2005 at 10:16 pm )
I saw this episode of Biography on History Channel. It was about Van Gogh.
It seems he was never respected in his time and most of his paintings were thrown or torn infront of his eyes. I dare anyone to even touch one of those now.
My opinion about painitings is that it reflects the artists state of mind. Each painting has its own audience. Not everyone likes renaissance, the first impression painting.
Another disadvantage with painting is that the hobby is really costly. One can be really famous or really nothing.
Van Gogh was nothing when he was alive, but after he died, his paintings are being sold for millions.
I really like the picture of the rock painting. I thought the picture was of a real sneaker which was run over by a car.
Good post.
( September 5th, 2005 at 12:45 am )
Shaili –> Thank you for sharing that viewpoint; it’s very interesting. I agree that the undiscovered art of today will someday be discovered as being unique, even though now most of it is being ignored. Regarding painting on rocks, I would also like to give such an art a try someday.
Sawai –> That is a very good example; it’s true that it’s either everything, or nothing. It could also be because of the audience, like you mentioned.