Comments on: Amber Alert vs. Baseball ticket sales

By: jesse

jesse — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:48:37 +0000

honestly it shouldn’t be an issue… They are letting government get involved in some things that (i think) could be better handled by private organizations. The amber alert system could replaced with something much better that wouldn’t cost the taxpayers anything… and baseball rocks!

By: Bes

Bes — Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:17:33 +0000

Noah Duffy -- > Yes, it comes down to the payment and the contract. I guess it's better to have some signs in effect than none of them.

Stacee -- > Yeah, so true.

Chau -- > Yes, money vs. Amber Alert, or the issue that Amber Alert aims to tackle.

By: Chau

Chau — Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:37:10 +0000

Yeah, money is the keyword here… I don’t think that it is right to do that vs. an Amber Alert though…

By: stacee

stacee — Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:14:44 +0000

i agree with you. but sometimes when money is involved, morals don’t matter so much to some people.

By: Noah Duffy

Noah Duffy — Thu, 22 Jun 2006 06:45:36 +0000

Hmm, I suppose I hold the same view you do. I’m sure it comes down to the city being paid to display the information regarding the basketball game. Still, who knows if it is the right thing to do. Let’s just be thankful that they don’t occupy all of the signs with basketball!